Traffic congestion

Traffic congestion on Marginal Pinheiros, near downtown São Paulo. According to Time magazine, São Paulo has the world's worst traffic jams.[1] Drivers are informed through variable message signs the prevailing queue length.
Highway 401 suffers chronic traffic congestion despite its width.
Congestion on a city road in Moscow.
A traffic jam in the Himalayas (Garhwal hills, India)
Bangkok is notorious for its traffic congestion.

Traffic congestion is a condition on road networks that occurs as use increases, and is characterized by slower speeds, longer trip times, and increased vehicular queueing. The most common example is the physical use of roads by vehicles. When traffic demand is great enough that the interaction between vehicles slows the speed of the traffic stream, congestion is incurred. As demand approaches the capacity of a road (or of the intersections along the road), extreme traffic congestion sets in. When vehicles are fully stopped for periods of time, this is colloquially known as a traffic jam.

Contents

Causes

Congestion on a street in Taipei consisting primarily of motorcycles.
Congestion caused by a road accident, Algarve, Portugal.
Congestion caused by evacuees fleeing Hurricane Rita. Traffic in all lanes of the highway is traveling in the same direction.

Traffic congestion occurs when a volume of traffic or modal split generates demand for space greater than the available road capacity, this is point is commonly termed saturation. There are a number of specific circumstances which cause or aggravate congestion; most of them reduce the capacity of a road at a given point or over a certain length, or increase the number of vehicles required for a given volume of people or goods. About half of U.S. traffic congestion is recurring, and is attributed to sheer weight of traffic; most of the rest is attributed to traffic incidents, road works and weather events.[2] Speed and flow can also affect network capacity though the relationship is complex.

Traffic research still cannot fully predict under which conditions a "traffic jam" (as opposed to heavy, but smoothly flowing traffic) may suddenly occur. It has been found that individual incidents (such as accidents or even a single car braking heavily in a previously smooth flow) may cause ripple effects (a cascading failure) which then spread out and create a sustained traffic jam when, otherwise, normal flow might have continued for some time longer.[3]

Mathematical theories

Some traffic engineers have attempted to apply the rules of fluid dynamics to traffic flow, likening it to the flow of a fluid in a pipe. Congestion simulations and real-time observations have shown that in heavy but free flowing traffic, jams can arise spontaneously, triggered by minor events ("butterfly effects"), such as an abrupt steering maneuver by a single motorist. Traffic scientists liken such a situation to the sudden freezing of supercooled fluid.[4] However, unlike a fluid, traffic flow is often affected by signals or other events at junctions that periodically affect the smooth flow of traffic. Alternative mathematical theories exist, such as Boris Kerner's three phase traffic theory.

Because of the poor correlation of theoretical models to actual observed traffic flows, transportation planners and highway engineers attempt to forecast traffic flow using empirical models. Their working traffic models typically use a combination of macro-, micro- and mesoscopic features, and may add matrix entropy effects, by "platooning" groups of vehicles and by randomising the flow patterns within individual segments of the network. These models are then typically calibrated by measuring actual traffic flows on the links in the network, and the baseline flows are adjusted accordingly.

It is now claimed that equations can predict these in detail:

Phantom jams can form when there is a heavy volume of cars on the road. In that high density of traffic, small disturbances (a driver hitting the brake too hard, or getting too close to another car) can quickly become amplified into a full-blown, self-sustaining traffic jam...
A team of MIT mathematicians has developed a model that describes how and under what conditions such jams form, which could help road designers minimize the odds of their formation. The researchers reported their findings May 26 in the online edition of Physical Review E.
Key to the new study is the realization that the mathematics of such jams, which the researchers call 'jamitons,' are strikingly similar to the equations that describe detonation waves produced by explosions, says Aslan Kasimov, lecturer in MIT's Department of Mathematics. That discovery enabled the team to solve traffic jam equations that were first theorized in the 1950s.[5]

Economic theories

India's economic surge has resulted in a massive increase in the number of private vehicles on its roads overwhelming the transport infrastructure. Shown here is a traffic jam in Delhi.
Same as India, China's economic surge has resulted in a massive increase in the number of private vehicles on its roads overwhelming the transport infrastructure. Shown here is a traffic jam in Beijing.

Congested roads can be seen as an example of the tragedy of the commons. Because roads in most places are free at the point of usage, there is little financial incentive for drivers not to over-use them, up to the point where traffic collapses into a jam, when demand becomes limited by opportunity cost. Privatization of highways and road pricing have both been proposed as measures that may reduce congestion through economic incentives and disincentives. Congestion can also happen due to non-recurring highway incidents, such as a crash or roadworks, which may reduce the road's capacity below normal levels.

Economist Anthony Downs, in his books Stuck in Traffic (1992) and Still Stuck in Traffic (2004), argues that rush hour traffic congestion is inevitable because of the benefits of having a relatively standard work day. In a capitalist economy, goods can be allocated either by pricing (ability to pay) or by queueing (first-come first-serve); congestion is an example of the latter. Instead of the traditional solution of making the "pipe" large enough to accommodate the total demand for peak-hour vehicle travel (a supply-side solution), either by widening roadways or increasing "flow pressure" via automated highway systems, Downs advocates greater use of road pricing to reduce congestion (a demand-side solution, effectively rationing demand), in turn plowing the revenues generated therefrom into public transportation projects. Road pricing itself is controversial, more information is available in the dedicated article.

Classification

Qualitative classification of traffic is often done in the form of a six letter A-F level of service (LOS) scale defined in the Highway Capacity Manual, a US document used (or used as a basis for national guidelines) worldwide. These levels are used by transportation engineers as a shorthand and to describe traffic levels to the lay public. While this system generally uses delay as the basis for its measurements, the particular measurements and statistical methods vary depending on the facility being described. For instance, while the percent time spent following a slower-moving vehicle figures into the LOS for a rural two-lane road, the LOS at an urban intersection incorporates such measurements as the number of drivers forced to wait through more than one signal cycle.[6]

Negative impacts

Traffic congestion detector in Germany.

Traffic congestion has a number of negative effects:

Countermeasures

It has been suggested by some commentators that the level of congestion that society tolerates is a rational (though not necessarily conscious) choice between the costs of improving the transportation system (in infrastructure or management) and the benefits of quicker travel. Others link it largely to subjective lifestyle choices, differentiating between car-owning and car-free households.

Road infrastructure

Urban planning and design

City planning and urban design practices can have a huge impact on levels of future traffic congestion, though they are of limited relevance for short-term change.

Supply and demand

Widening works underway on the M25 motorway to increase the number of lanes.

Congestion can be reduced by either increasing road capacity (supply), or by reducing traffic (demand). Capacity can be increased in a number of ways, but needs to take account of latent demand otherwise it may be used more strongly than anticipated. Critics of the approach of adding capacity have compared it to "fighting obesity by letting out your belt" (inducing demand that did not exist before).[9][10] Reducing road capacity has in turn been attacked as removing free choice as well as increasing travel costs and times.

Increased supply can include:

Reduction of demand can include:

Traffic management

Use of so-called Intelligent transportation system, which guide traffic:

Other associated

By country

Iran

Because of low price of gas and gasoil in Iran and inadequate public transportation traffic congestion is a common problem in different cities like Mash'had, Isfahan, Shiraz and especially Tehran (capital city of Iran). Recently developing Metro and BRT systems in Tehran and strategies for limiting gas uses has been applied to reduce car using, but unfortunately the problem is still crucial.

China

The Beijing-Zhangjiakou highway traffic jam in Hebei province, PRC, is an ongoing situation in August 2010.[32][33] So far the traffic congestion has stretched more than 100 kilometers and 10 days.[34][35]

Australia

Traffic during peak hours in major Australian cities, such as Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane and Perth, is usually very congested and can cause considerable delay for motorists. Australians rely mainly on radio and television to obtain current traffic information. GPS, webcams, and online resources are increasingly being used to monitor and relay traffic conditions to motorists.[36] Measures put in place by the federal and state government to combat traffic congestion include construction of new road infrastructure and increased investment in public transport. In Brisbane, ongoing road works projects on many major roads have caused ongoing congestion throughout the city and increased commutes considerably.

Brazil

Typical traffic jam in São Paulo downtown, despite road space rationing by plate number. Rua da Consolação, São Paulo, Brasil.

In Brazil the recent records of traffic jams over the major big cities are recognized by public authorities as one of the main challenges for São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte, Brasilia, Curitiba and Porto Alegre, where due to the country's economic bonanza, the automobile fleets have almost doubled in several of these cities from 2000 to 2008.

According to Time magazine, São Paulo has the world's worst traffic jams.[1] On June 10, 2009, the historical record was set with more than 182 miles (293 km) of accumulated queues out of 522 mi (835 km) being monitored.[37] Despite implementation since 1997 of road space rationing by the last digit of the plate number during rush hours every weekday, traffic in this 20 million city still experiences severe congestion. According to experts, this is due to the accelerated rate of motorization occurring since 2003, in São Paulo the fleet is growing at a rate of 7.5% per year, with almost 1,000 new cars bought in the city every day, and the limited capacity of public transport. The subway has only 38 miles (61 km) of lines, though 22 further miles are under construction or planned by 2010. Every day, many citizens spend between three up to four hours behind the wheel. In order to mitigate the aggravating congestion problem, since June 30, 2008 the road space rationing program was expanded to include and restrict trucks and light commercial vehicles.[38][39]

Colombia

In Bogotá the excessive traffic jams cause high levels of stress in people, and are the main cause of air pollution. The problem has been mitigated partially since 2000 through the implementation of the TransMilenio, a bus rapid transit system that has been improving mobility throughout the city. The city also restricts use of vehicles several days each week depending on the last digits of license plates. However, this system, called 'Pico y placa' tends to promote the purchase of second cars by the wealthy.

Hong Kong

Hong Kong aborted a congestion pricing system in the 1980s due to public pressure and has since relied on a vehicle high purchase tax to discourage overall car purchasing but has developed no localised congestion management techniques, However the Transport Department in Hong Kong has set up websites with maps showing congestion for the Cross Harbor Tunnel, it has also set up signs on both sides of the harbor telling drivers which is the quickest way to get to the other side of Victoria Harbor.

Netherlands

The road network in the Netherlands is usually congested in the morning and afternoon rush hour on working days. However, the rush hour periods seem to have become longer and longer and one may occasionally run into congestion any time of the day or night. Commuter traffic to and from major cities such as Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague, Utrecht, Eindhoven, Zwolle, Enschede and Groningen may cause congestion. Congestion is difficult to resolve because the Netherlands is a relatively densely populated country where there is little room for expansion. Proposals for a "pay per distance travelled" is thought to discourage car driving but has not been implemented yet due to car owner resistance.

New Zealand

New Zealand has followed strongly car-oriented transport policies since after World War II (especially in the Auckland area, where about one third of the country's population lives),[40] and currently has one of the highest car-ownership rates per capita in the world, after the United States.[41] Because of the negative results, congestion in the big centres is a major problem. Current measures include both the construction of new road infrastructure as well as increased investment in public transport, which had strongly declined in all cities of the country except Wellington.

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom the inevitability of congestion in some urban road networks has been officially recognised since the Department for Transport set down policies based on the report Traffic in Towns in 1963:

Even when everything that it is possibly to do by way of building new roads and expanding public transport has been done, there would still be, in the absence of deliberate limitation, more cars trying to move into, or within our cities than could possibly be accommodated.[42].

The Department for Transport sees growing congestion as one of the most serious transport problems facing the UK.[43] On 1 December 2006, Rod Eddington published a UK government-sponsored report into the future of Britain's transport infrastructure. The Eddington Transport Study set out the case for action to improve road and rail networks, as a "crucial enabler of sustained productivity and competitiveness". Eddington has estimated that congestion may cost the economy of England £22 bn a year in lost time by 2025. He warned that roads were in serious danger of becoming so congested that the economy would suffer.[44] At the launch of the report Eddington told journalists and transport industry representatives introducing road pricing to encourage drivers to drive less was an "economic no-brainer". There was, he said "no attractive alternative". It would allegedly cut congestion by half by 2025, and bring benefits to the British economy totalling £28 bn a year.[45]

On Fridays in California, Interstate 5 is often congested as Los Angeles residents travel north for the weekend.

United States

The Texas Transportation Institute estimated that, in 2000, the 75 largest metropolitan areas experienced 3.6 billion vehicle-hours of delay, resulting in 5.7 billion U.S. gallons (21.6 billion liters) in wasted fuel and $67.5 billion in lost productivity, or about 0.7% of the nation's GDP. It also estimated that the annual cost of congestion for each driver was approximately $1,000 in very large cities and $200 in small cities. Traffic congestion is increasing in major cities and delays are becoming more frequent in smaller cities and rural areas.

In 2005, the three areas in the United States with the highest levels of traffic congestion were Los Angeles, New York City, and Chicago. The congestion cost for the Los Angeles area alone was estimated at US$9.325 billion.[46]

Between 1980 and 1999 the total number of miles of vehicle travel increased by 76 percent.[47] [48] National and local highway construction programs have accommodated some, but not all, of this traffic growth.

Venezuela

While most of the world is troubled with high gas prices, Venezuela has the lowest gas price in the world. They pay 0.097 bolivars, an equivalent of $0.03 per liter or $0.12 per gallon.[49] Venezuela has fixed their price of gasoline at this rate since 1998, even though it is estimated that the government could save $3 billion dollars a year by cutting 30 minutes from the average drive time.[50]

Zarhay Infante leaves home shortly after 5am on a 30km (19 miles) drive to her job in the capital. If her journey goes well, she gets there three-and-a-half hours later. Three years ago she could go to Caracas in 45 minutes on the motorway. According to Zarhay, "It gets worse every day."[50]

The government which preceded leftist Hugo Chávez began raising gasoline prices. However, upon taking office Chávez froze prices in bolivar terms.

Traffic jam in Los Angeles, 1953

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Andrew Downie (2008-04-21). "The World's Worst Traffic Jams". Time. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1733872,00.html. Retrieved 2008-06-20. 
  2. Federal Highway Administration "Congestion: A National Issue". 2008-08-29. http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/aboutus/opstory.htm Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved 2008-09-25. 
  3. "Science Hobbyist: Traffic Waves". http://www.amasci.com/amateur/traffic/traffic1.html. 
  4. Critical Mass - Ball, Philip, ISBN 0-09-945786-5
  5. Mathematicians Take Aim At 'Phantom' Traffic Jams
  6. Traffic Engineering, Third Edition. Roger P. Roess, Elana S. Prassas, and William R. McShane. ISBN 0-13-142471-8
  7. British to help China build 'eco-cities' - The Observer, November 6, 2005
  8. Wired, Pop-Up Cities: China Builds a Bright Green Metropolis, 04.24.07
  9. Dreaming of a Clean Car? - Kay, Jane Holtz, journalist and author
  10. 2005 Mayors Luncheon (from the NAIOP website, Tampa Bay, United States)
  11. Hermann Knoflacher (2006). "A new way to organize parking: the key to a successful sustainable transport system for the future". Environment and Urbanization (International Institute for Environment and Development) 18 (2): 387–400. doi:10.1177/0956247806069621. 
  12. Shoup, Donald C. (2005). The High Cost of Free Parking. American Planning Association. ISBN 1884829988. 
  13. Knoflacher, Hermann (January 2001) [2001] (in German). Stehzeuge. Der Stau ist kein Verkehrsproblem.. Vienna: Böhlau. ISBN 978-3205989882. 
  14. Goddard, Haynes (July 1997). "Using Tradeable Permits to Achieve Sustainability in the World's Large Cities". Environmental and Resource Economics (Springer Netherlands) 10 (1): 63–99. doi:10.1023/A:1026444113237. 
  15. The high cost of motoring in Singapore - Toh, Rex S., Business Horizons, March-April, 1994
  16. "LEDA Measure: License plate based traffic restrictions, Athens, Greece". LEDA database. http://www.leda.ils.nrw.de/database/measures/meas0205.htm. Retrieved 2008-04-09. 
  17. 17.0 17.1 "Regulatory restrictions". KonSULT, the Knowledgebase on Sustainable Urban Land use and Transport. Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds. http://www.elseviersocialsciences.com/transport/konsult/private/level2/instruments/instrument009/l2_009a.htm. Retrieved 2008-04-20. 
  18. Henley, Jon (2005-03-15). "Paris drive to cut traffic in centre by 75%". The Guardian (London: Guardian Media Group). http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/mar/15/france.jonhenley. 
  19. Simon, Hermann; Robert J Dolan. "Price Customization". Marketing Management (American Marketing Association) 7 (3). 
  20. Andersen, Bjørn (January 1993). "A survey of the Swiss public transport system and policy". Transport Reviews 13 (1): 61–81. doi:10.1080/01441649308716835. 
  21. Adrian May (2007-03-16). "The philosophy and practice of Taktfahrplan: a case-study of the East Coast Main Line" (Working Paper). Working Paper 579. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2058/. Retrieved 2008-04-27. 
  22. Ogilvie, David; Matt Egan, Val Hamilton, Mark Petticrew (2004-09-22). "Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review". British Medical Journal (BMJ Publishing Group) 329 (7469): 763. doi:10.1136/bmj.38216.714560.55. PMID 15385407. 
  23. Rietveld, Piet; Vanessa Daniel (August 2004). "Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter?". Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice (Elsevier) 38 (7): 531–550. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.05.003. 
  24. "Cycling in the Netherlands". Rijkswaterstaat (Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management). http://www.fietsberaad.nl/library/repository/bestanden/Cycling%20in%20the%20Netherlands%20VenW.pdf. 
  25. Matt Rosenberg (2007-09-26). "Slow But Steady "Telework Revolution" Eyed". Cascadia Prospectus. http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&program=DI%20Main%20Page%20-%20News&id=4235. Retrieved 2007-10-07. 
  26. "Motoring Towards 2050 – Roads and Reality". RAC foundation. http://www.racfoundation.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=535&Itemid=31. 
  27. "Smarter Choices - Changing the way we travel". Department for Transport. http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/sustainable/smarterchoices/ctwwt/. 
  28. "New & Innovative Concepts for Helping European Transport Sustainability". Niches Policy seminar. Committee of the Regions; Niches. December 2006. 
  29. Highways Agency (2007-10-25). "M42 Active Traffic Management Results –First Six Months" (PDF). Department for Transport. http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/tpm/m42activetrafficmanagement/ATM6MonthSummaryResultsforP1.pdf. Retrieved 2007-12-31. 
  30. WhyBike? (2006-03-06). "All the info you need on lanesharing (lanesplitting)". http://www.whybike.com/motorcycle274.htm. 
  31. http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/838947-worlds-longest-traffic-jam-10-days-and-counting
  32. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11062708
  33. http://blogs.wsj.com/drivers-seat/2010/08/26/china-traffic-jam-eases-but-experts-say-it-could-happen-again/
  34. http://boingboing.net/2010/08/24/photos-from-chinas-1.html
  35. "Traffic Jam welcomes you". Traffic Jam: Latest on traffic conditions. Hitz Techno Pvt. Ltd.. 12/9/08. http://www.trafficjam.com. Retrieved 2009-02-01. 
  36. SP registra 293 km de congestionamentos; motorista deve evitar centro expandido até as 22h
  37. "Kassab restringe carga e descarga em SP e inclui caminhões no rodízio" (in Portuguese). Folha de São Paulo Online. 2008-04-01. http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/cotidiano/ult95u387928.shtml. Retrieved 2008-06-20. 
  38. Folha de São Paulo (2008-06-18). "Kassab cria rodízio para caminhão no centro" (in Portuguese). INTELOG. http://www.intelog.net/site/default.asp?TroncoID=907492&SecaoID=508074&SubsecaoID=948063&Template=../artigosnoticias/user_exibir.asp&ID=252171&Titulo=Kassab%20cria%20rod%EDzio%20para%20caminh%E3o%20no%20centro. Retrieved 2008-06-20. 
  39. Backtracking Auckland: Bureaucratic rationality and public preferences in transport planning - Mees, Paul; Dodson, Jago; Urban Research Program Issues Paper 5, Griffith University, April 2006
  40. Modern Society (from Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Accessed 2008-04-25.)
  41. Traffic in Towns. Penguin Books in association with HMSO. 1963/4. 
  42. "Tackling congestion on our roads". Department for Transport. http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/roadcongestion/. 
  43. "Delivering choice and reliability". Department for Transport. http://www.dft.gov.uk/press/speechesstatements/speeches/congestion. 
  44. Rod Eddington (December 2006). "The Eddington Transport Study". UK Treasury. http://www.dft.gov.uk/about/strategy/transportstrategy/eddingtonstudy/. 
  45. Table 2. Components of the Congestion Problem, 2005 Urban Area Totals (from the Texas Transportation Institute website. Accessed 2008-01-25.)
  46. Annual Vehicle Miles of Travel. Federal Highway Administration. 2003-02-14. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/onh00/graph1.htm. Retrieved 2007-05-06 
  47. FHWA, Office of Highway Policy Information. "The Highway System". http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/onh00/onh2p5.htm. Retrieved 2009-02-24 
  48. Wilson, Peter. Venezuela: Land of 12-Cent Gas. Business Week 23 May 2008 6 Nov 2008
  49. 50.0 50.1 Jam Today: The Price of Cheap Petrol. The Economist 11 Sep 2008 6 Nov 2008 .

Further reading

External links